zurück <- | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -> vor |
[Example auto industry]
VW said: We need 7% yearly productivity growth in order to maintain our industrial location here. VW alone. 7% yearly productivity growth - how do you achieve that? You could, for example, yearly produce the same number of cars but with 7% fewer workers. How often can you lay off 7% of the workforce until no-one is left? ☺ Not really future-proof, or...? In 20 years from now you will want to have your equity-based pension secured with your VW shares. Until then you have to sit it through. The other variant would be: produce with the same number of workers but pay them 7% less every year. Until they can't come to work any longer - That doesn't work either. The only viable possibility is: with the same number of workers and the same pay produce 7% more cars. That's how VW manages it. But this is not really the problem. The problem is selling these things. In Europe we already produce 20% more cars than can be sold. And on top of this VW wants 7% gain in productivity - annually! That's exponential growth. Already your grandchildren will have to buy a new car every second month. ☺[Example mobile phones]
With mobile phones we have already reached this point. ☺ For years now we have more mobile phones than Germans. Above all, more mobile phones than Germans who know how to use them. ☺☺ But aren't mobile phones the growth market per se? Incessantly new mobile phone corner shops are opening up everywhere. I have the impression that in pedestrian precincts only two kinds of businesses open up: tanning salons and mobile phone shops. That's the climax of Western civilization. You let your brain be fried as preparation for your next mobile phone purchase. ☺☺ And with a trained eye you can judge from a person's skin tan how many mobile phones he has in his pockets. ☺☺ And you have to play along, you have to keep buying, buying, buying ... Especially mobile phones, it's a growth market - you have to keep pace, and buy a mobile phone every month. And don't come up with the that old excuse - you only have two ears. That's absolutely no argument. You possess 20 pairs of shoes and yet only have two feet. There you got the message. ☺ Yes, in that area women at least have a natural capitalistic intelligence. ☺[The driving force]
Capitalism is like the fairy-tale of the fisher and his wife. Still remember that old story? The fisherman was at sea and caught a flounder, and the flounder fulfilled a wish for him. He comes home and his wife says: where did you get that? That's a present I got from a flounder. His wife says: not bad, but go back out, because I could do with this and that. He goes to sea once more and tells the flounder: flounder, I'm very sorry, it's quite unpleasant for me, but my wife isn't satisfied yet - she also wants such-and-such. OK, no problem, you will also get that. The fisher comes home. His wife says: it's working fine. Listen, I also need this and that. And she sends him back out to sea. And always the same story, on and on -zurück <- | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -> vor |